Tuesday 26 February 2013

Conclave... Benedict XVI

MOTU PROPRIO: POPE LEAVES EXPEDITION OF CONCLAVE UP TO CARDINALS


Vatican City, 25 February 2013 (VIS) – In an unofficial translation of the Apostolic Letter in the form of a Motu Proprio by Holy Father Benedict XVI and dated 22 February, following are a few amendments concerning the election of the Roman Pontiff.

“With the Apostolic Letter 'De aliquibus mutationibus in normis de electione Romani Ponteficis' given as a Motu Proprio in Rome on 11 June 2007 in the third year of my pontificate, I established some norms that, rescinding those prescribed in no. 75 of the Apostolic Constitution 'Universi Dominici Gregis' promulgated by my predecessor Blessed John Paul II, have re-established the regulation, sanctioned by tradition, according to which a two thirds majority of the votes of the Cardinal electors present is always required for the valid election of the Roman Pontiff.”

“Considering the importance of ensuring the best implementation of what is concerned, albeit with a different significance, regarding the election of the Roman Pontiff, in particular a more certain interpretation and execution of some provisions, I establish and prescribe that some norms of the Apostolic Constitution 'Universi Dominici Gregis', as well as what I myself set forth in the above-mentioned Apostolic Letter, be replaced with the following norms:

35. “No Cardinal elector can be excluded from active or passive voice in the election of the Supreme Pontiff, for any reason or pretext, with due regard for the provisions of No. 40 and No. 75 of this Constitution.”

37. “I furthermore decree that, from the moment when the Apostolic See is lawfully vacant, the Cardinal electors who are present must wait fifteen full days for those who are absent before beginning the Conclave; however, the College of Cardinals is also granted the faculty to anticipated the beginning of the Conclave if all the Cardinal electors are present as well as the faculty to defer, for serious reasons, the beginning of the election for a few days more. But when a maximum of twenty days have elapsed from the beginning of the vacancy of the See, all the Cardinal electors present are obliged to proceed to the election.”

43. “From the beginning of the electoral process until the public announcement that the election of the Supreme Pontiff has taken place, or in any case until the new Pope so disposes, the rooms of the Domus Sanctae Marthae, and in particular the Sistine Chapel and the areas reserved for liturgical celebrations are to be closed to unauthorized persons, by the authority of the Cardinal Camerlengo and with the outside assistance of the Vice Camerlengo and the Substitute of the Secretariat of State, in accordance with the provisions set forth in the following Numbers.”

“During this period, the entire territory of Vatican City and the ordinary activity of the offices located therein shall be regulated, for the period mentioned, in a way that ensures the confidentiality and the free development of all the undertakings connected with the election of the Supreme Pontiff. In particular, provision shall be made, with the help of the Cleric Prelates of the Chamber to ensure that no one approaches the Cardinal electors while they are being transported from the Domus Sanctae Marthae to the Apostolic Vatican Palace.”

46, 1. “In order to meet the personal and official needs connected with the election process, the following individuals must be available and therefore properly lodged in suitable areas within the confines mentioned in No. 43 of this Constitution: the Secretary of the College of Cardinals, who acts as Secretary of the electoral assembly; the Master of Papal Liturgical Celebrations with eight Masters of Ceremonies and two Religious attached to the Papal Sacristy; and an ecclesiastic chosen by the Cardinal Dean or by the Cardinal taking his place, in order to assist him in his duties.”

47. “All the persons listed in No. 46 and No. 55, 2 of this Constitution who in any way or at any time should come to learn anything from any source, directly or indirectly, regarding the election process, and in particular regarding the voting which took place in the election itself, are obliged to maintain strict secrecy with all persons extraneous to the College of Cardinal electors: accordingly, before the election begins, they shall take an oath in the form and using the formula indicated in No. 48.”

48. “The persons listed in No. 46 and No. 55, 2 of this Constitution, having been duly warned about the meaning and extent of the oath that they are to take, before the start of the election process, shall, in the presence of the Cardinal Camerlengo or another Cardinal delegated by him, and in the presence of two numerary participant Apostolic Protonotaries, in due course swear and sign the oath according to the following formula:”

“I, N.N., promise and swear that, unless I should receive a special faculty given expressly by the newly-elected Pontiff or by his successors, I will observe absolute and perpetual secrecy with all who are not part of the College of Cardinal electors concerning all matters directly or indirectly related to the ballots cast and their scrutiny for the election of the Supreme Pontiff.”

“I likewise promise and swear to refrain from using any audio or video equipment capable of recording anything which takes place during the period of the election within Vatican City, and in particular anything which in any way, directly or indirectly, is related to the process of the election itself.”

“I declare that I take this oath fully aware that an infraction thereof will make me subject to the penalty of excommunication 'latae sententiae', which is reserved to the Apostolic See."

“So help me God and these Holy Gospels, which I touch with my hand.”

49. “When the funeral rites for the deceased Pope have been celebrated according to the prescribed ritual, and everything necessary for the regular functioning of the election has been prepared, on the appointed day of the beginning of the Conclave established in conformity with the provisions of No. 37 of the present Constitution, the Cardinal electors shall meet in the Basilica of Saint Peter's in the Vatican, or elsewhere, should circumstances warrant it, in order to take part in a solemn Eucharistic celebration with the Votive Mass 'Pro Eligendo Papa'. This celebration should preferably take place at a suitable hour in the morning, so that in the afternoon the prescriptions of the following Numbers of this Constitution can be carried out.”

50. From the Pauline Chapel of the Apostolic Palace, where they will assemble at a suitable hour in the afternoon, the Cardinal electors, in choir dress and invoking the assistance of the Holy Spirit with the chant of the 'Veni Creator', will solemnly process to the Sistine Chapel of the Apostolic Palace, where the election will be held. The Vice Camerlengo, the General Auditor of the Apostolic Camera, and two members of each of the colleges of numerary participant Apostolic Protonotaries, Prelate Auditors of the Roman Rota, and Cleric Prelates of the Chamber will participate in the procession.

51, 2. “It will therefore be the responsibility of the College of Cardinals, operating under the authority and responsibility of the Camerlengo, assisted by the Particular Congregation mentioned in No. 7 of the present Constitution, and with the outside assistance of the Vice Camerlengo and the Substitute of the Secretariat of State, to make all prior arrangements for the interior of the Sistine Chapel and adjacent areas to be prepared, so that an orderly election and its privacy will be ensured.”

55, 3. “Should any infraction whatsoever of this norm occur, those responsible should know that they will be subject to the penalty of excommunication 'latae sententiae', which is reserved to the Apostolic See."

62. “Since the forms of election known as 'per acclamationem seu inspirationem' and 'per compromissum' are abolished, the form of electing the Roman Pontiff shall henceforth be 'per scrutinium' alone.”

“I therefore decree that, for the valid election of the Roman Pontiff, at least two thirds of the votes are required, calculated on the basis of the total number of electors present and voting.”

64. “The voting process is carried out in three phases. The first phase, which can be called the pre-scrutiny, comprises: 1) the preparation and distribution of the ballot papers by the Masters of Ceremonies—called meanwhile into the Hall together with the Secretary of the College of Cardinals and with the Master of Papal Liturgical Celebrations—who give at least two or three to each Cardinal elector; 2) the drawing by lot, from among all the Cardinal electors, of three Scrutineers, of three persons charged with collecting the votes of the sick, called for the sake of brevity 'Infirmarii', and of three Revisers; this drawing is carried out in public by the junior Cardinal Deacon, who draws out nine names, one after another, of those who shall carry out these tasks; 3) if, in the drawing of lots for the Scrutineers, 'Infirmarii' and Revisers, there should come out the names of Cardinal electors who because of infirmity or other reasons are unable to carry out these tasks, the names of others who are not impeded are to be drawn in their place. The first three drawn will act as Scrutineers, the second three as 'Infirmarii', and the last three as Revisers.”

70, 2. “The Scrutineers add up all the votes that each individual has received, and if no one has obtained at least two thirds of the votes on that ballot, the Pope has not been elected; if however it turns out that someone has obtained at least two thirds of the votes, the canonically valid election of the Roman Pontiff has taken place.”

75. “If the votes referred to in Nos. 72, 73, and 74 of the above-mentioned Constitution do not result in an election, a day will be dedicated to prayer, reflection, and discussion. In subsequent votes, in accordance with the procedure established in No. 74 of this same Constitution, only the two whose names have received the greatest number of votes in the immediately preceding ballot will have the passive electoral right. There can be no waiving of the requirement that a valid election takes place only by a qualified majority of at least two thirds of the votes of the cardinals who are present and voting. Moreover, in these ballots, the two persons who enjoy the passive electoral right lose their active electoral right.”

“When the election has canonically taken place, the junior Cardinal Deacon summons into the Hall of election the Secretary of the College of Cardinals, the Master of Papal Liturgical Celebrations, and two Masters of Ceremonies. The Cardinal Dean, or the Cardinal who is first in order and seniority, in the name of the whole College of electors, then asks the consent of the one elected in the following words: 'Do you accept your canonical election as Supreme Pontiff?' And, as soon as he has received the consent, he asks him: 'By what name do you wish to be called?' Then the Master of Papal Liturgical Celebrations, acting as notary and having as witnesses the two Masters of Ceremonies, draws up a document certifying acceptance by the new Pope and the name taken by him.”

“This document will enter into force immediately upon its publication in the Osservatore Romano.”

“This I do decree and establish, notwithstanding any instruction to the contrary.”

“Given in Rome, at Saint Peter’s, on 22 February in the year 2013, the eighth of my Pontificate.”
[from an e-mail from Rajasekaran]

Monday 18 February 2013

A critique on Abp Pakiam's Pastoral Letter...

[A critique on Abp Pakiam's Pastoral Letter No. 001/2013/CL Dated 08.02.2013 titled “Thabasukaalam 2013” with a note to be read during Mass on 17th, I Sunday of Lent.]


At long last, you have come out with the tip of the berg! It is indeed a good sign to begin with the Lent. It is ‘better to be late than never!’ While appreciating this good gesture, I would like to comment on some of your points.

The letter states rightly that ‘a disciple is one who values Jesus more than anything.’ But the question is: Who is this Jesus? Matthew 25:40 and 45 identifies the ‘son of man’/’king’ with the ‘least of his brethren’. Is he/she not the ‘anawim’ of Yahweh, those denied of justice?

You ‘being content with what one has’ could be interpreted conveniently! The so-called ‘rich’ would mean this to be the meager ‘left over’ after their avaricious grabbing. Here, it is good to remember what Gandhiji seems to have said: ‘There is enough for everyone’s need but not to anyone’s greed!’ Birds seem to be contended as they are not denied of their due like some unfortunate humans by the avaricious ones. Jesus taught us to ‘pray for our daily bread’ and not to be anxious of tomorrow. Praying could also mean laboring and daily bread, the necessities of everyday life like clothing and shelter. Love also means caring and sharing. Bread is to be broken and shared with the hungry.

You have presented the national data on BPL, ill-fed children, illiteracy aggravated by inadequate educational infrastructure, people devoid of shelter and other basic amenities, besides potable water, poor health and hygiene paving way for contagious disease and so on. But what are the situation in our archdiocese in this year of Platinum Jubilee and Synod? As you have rightly observed Trivandrum district, mostly the coastal regions where our people are crowded, is one of the two districts pointed out as the most backward, especially in education and health and hygiene. Recent reports on ‘public defecation’ in the said area are really a shame for all of us!

These people were under the stewardship of the church since the time of Francis Xavier and especially our diocese/archdiocese! What have we really done? Could we not have made them a ‘self-esteemed’ people at least, leave alone everything else? If only we had the determination to do so would have certainly worked wonders. Have we not had our share in the exploitation of our people in the manner of the very shepherd becoming a thief, if not a butcher himself!

You seem to refer to ‘resourceful’ people keeping aloof of the church! As long as we don’t take them into confidence and entrust them with responsibilities, this sad situation may unfortunately continue.

You may present the detailed accounts to the ‘responsible’ bodies, if you prefer so, though such bodies are not without qualifications. They seemingly don’t have any loyalty to anyone or anything than to you who have appointed them. It would be preferable to have bodies like the CAG of the Central Government which is a Constitutional and autonomous body having no ‘loyalty’ to any individual or group whatever be his/her/its status or sanctity. All should ultimately be responsible to the people than to anyone else.

Contrary to your seeming perception, transparency and accountability would certainly make you really and morally stronger. Your intervention, when the integrity of your lieutenants is in question, normally sends wrong signals and facilitate the tainted ones go goat free. When a good number of our people lack miserably many of the necessities of life, the responsible ones should be scrupulously clean, especially in money matters.

As your statements show almost 20% of the `20 crores, that is nearly `4 crores, was seemingly spend miscellaneously! It is gross irresponsibility, if not outrageous, to the core! The shocking revelation that a nominal 2.81% alone was spent on education doesn’t tally with the claim of 29% of the archdiocesan receipts were spent on the same. However, most of our schools are without necessary infrastructure still when crores are squandered on churches, shrines and rectories!

No money transaction be done without proper documentary acknowledgement. Even the offering box money should be acknowledged besides the auctioning of the offertory materials. No one would believe that our priests would take this seriously. One wonders as to how priests manage cars and wear gold ornaments in the pretext of Rosary and gifts besides all sorts of cell phones and other electronic gadgets.

Every celebration, to be meaningful, should be accompanied by corresponding projects like home for the homeless and marrying the really poor girls, educating a deserving student and so on. Dowry system in any form should be abolished taking all assistance from the available laws of the land. No trading whatsoever with Mass stipends, if it can’t be abolished for good. We should be models of simple and contended living. Let us concentrate the most on our being than having…

Any default by anyone, especially a priest, should be properly and exemplarily be compensated, if not fined. Why not priests come out declaring their assets? Priests should always stand free of financial liabilities, especially the ones from the celebration of their ordination, jubilee and so on.

Last, but not the least, let us pay our workers justly and grant them necessary rest and leave besides provide them with safe working conditions?





Wednesday 13 February 2013

Love and lust...

No 'love' lasts without lust
all love is lost without that.
Is not lust, love for the body
rather than the 'soul' within?

It is 
a drive not easy to resist
a passion hard to desist
could make one blind, if not mad.

Would go any length to meet the mate
won't easily be satisfied with 
anything less than mating
failing to get co-operation 
won't hesitate to coax or conquer.

Basic instinct it is, they say
but base it is, others profess!
It is knowledge, as in 
'Adam knew Eve!' 

'Shanti muhoortam' it is 
in the tradition of Hindus
for only then the couple
experience peace so profound
and fulfillment so perfect.

'Purusha and prakriti,
Sakthi and Siva,
Atman and Brahman
are dualities representing
the male-female factors and
the Siva -linga is the symbol 
perfect of fertility.

This is the terminology
the mystics resort to
while describing the
divine-human intercourse